Cases 1 - 8 of 8
National Association of Home, et al v. EPA, et al
as 13-5290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National Association of Home Builders, Southern Arizona Home Builders Association and Home Builders Association of Central Arizona
Defendant - Appellee:
Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
HUFFMAN et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. HUFFMAN and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY , LISA P. JACKSON , UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Movant:
SIERRA CLUB , WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY , COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Natl' Assoc. of Home Builders, et al v. EPA, et al
as 10-5341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National Association of Home Builders, Southern Arizona Home Builders Association, as successor to National Association of Home Builders and Home Builders Association of Central Arizona, as successor to National Association of Home Builders
Defendant - Appellee:
Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa Perez Jackson, In her official capacity as the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Shapiro, In his official capacity as the Acting Assistant Administrator for Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
NEW HOPE POWER COMPANY et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2009cv02413
Plaintiff:
NEW HOPE POWER COMPANY and OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and STEVEN L. STOCKTON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
TURKEY CREEK COMMUNITY INITIATIVES et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 1:2007cv01507
Plaintiff:
TURKEY CREEK COMMUNITY INITIATIVES and NORTH GULFPORT COMMUNITY LAND CONSERVANCY INC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
P & V Ent, et al v. US Army Corps Eng, et al
as 07-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
P & V Enterprises, Friendly Valley Equestrian Condo View Homes Inc, SCC Acquisitions Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Carl A. Strock, Lieutenant General and Commander and Chief Engineers
SE Fed Power Cust v. Harvey, Francis J., et al
as 06-5080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southeastern Federal Power Customers, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Army, Joseph W. Westphal, in his official capacity as the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Robert B. Flowers, Lt. General in his official capacity as the Commander, United States Army Corp of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
City of Gainsville, State of Georgia, Cobb County Marietta Water Authority and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
American Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Alabama Rivers Alliance, Apalachicola Bay & Riverkeeper, Inc., Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. and others
SE Fed Power Cust v. Caldera (St of FL), et al
as 04-5143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southeastern Federal Power Customers, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Louis Caldera, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army, Joseph W. Westphal, in his official capacity as the Assistant Secretary of the Army, Robert B. Flowers, Lt. General in his official capacity as the Commander, United States Army Corp of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
City of Gainsville, State of Georgia, Cobb County Marietta Water Authority and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
American Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Alabama Rivers Alliance, Apalachicola Bay & Riverkeeper, Inc., Chattahoochee Riverkeeper and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
