Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Scott Hodes v. TREA
as 13-5348
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Scott A. Hodes
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Department of the Treasury
HODES v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2012cv01435
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HODES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BREHM v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2007cv01739
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BREHM
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and SCOTT KOCH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Scott Tooley v. Janet Napolitano
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Scott Tooley
Defendant - Appellee:
George W. Bush, President, Richard B. Cheney, Vice President, Alberto R. Gonzales, former Attorney General of the United States, in his personal capacity and others
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Cassandra Sturkie Bernstein and Richard Paul Bress
HODES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. HODES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
![Featured Case Featured Case](https://static.justia.com/images/icons/star.png)
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2006cv01080
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL V. HAYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.