Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ASHOUR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff: MOHAMMED ASHOUR
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, NEW ORLEANS ASYLUM OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
AGOFSKY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff: SHANNON AGOFSKY
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 22-5267
Plaintiff / Appellant: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Matt Campbell, Diana Hetzel and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli and William Prevatel, AIA
Defendant / Appellee: Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, James Olthoff, Dr.; in his official capacity as Director of the National Institute for Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology and others
SALIM et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2022cv02167
Plaintiff: Karam Salim, Doaa Salim, KARIM SALIM and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MAHMOUD et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2022cv01837
Plaintiff: MOWAFAQ HASAN MAHMOUD MAHMOUD, Wafaa S.M. Mohammed Mohammed, KAREEM MOWAFAW HASAN MAHMOUD and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5084
Plaintiff / Appellant: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5061
Plaintiff / Appellee: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellant: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH et al v. RAIMONDO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02365
Plaintiff: ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH, ROBERT MCILVAINE, MATT CAMPBELL and others
Defendant: Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO, Dr. JAMES OLTHOFF, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
YACOUB et al v. BLINKEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00983
Plaintiff: CAROLYN BEE, MAMDOUH HANNA, NEVEEN YOUSSEF and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and ANTONY J. BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
CAVAZOS et al v. BERNHARDT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02942
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF DOLORES HERNANDEZ, ESTATE OF ANDY SHULER, CELESTE HAMNER and others
Defendant: TARA SWEENEY, DARRYL LACOUNTE and DAVID BERNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?