Cases 11 - 16 of 16
IN RE: INPHONIC, INC., WIRELESS PHONE REBATE LITIGATION - MDL-1792
as 1:2006mc00507
Defendant:
ANDREW B. ZEINFELD, BRIAN T. WESTRICK, CONTINENTAL PROMOTION GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN DAVIS, BARRY R. FRIEDRICH, RON VINCENT and others
In Re:
INPHONIC, INC., WIRELESS PHONE REBATE LITIGATION - MDL 1792
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
City of Harper Woods Employees v. Richard (Dick) Olver, et al
as 08-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Harper Woods Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of BAE Systems, PLC.
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard (Dick) L. Olver, Michael J. Turner, Walter P. Havenstein and others
COLORADO HEART INSTITUTE, LLC et al v. LEVITT
as 1:2008cv01626
Plaintiff:
COLORADO HEART INSTITUTE, LLC, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CARDIOVASCULAR INSTITUTE, LLC, FOUR CORNERS REGIONAL HEART INSTITUTE, LLC and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEVITT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Series 7 Broker Qualification
as 07-7162
:
In re: Series 7 Broker Qualification Exam Scoring Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Lowe, Timothy Wallin, Linda Cutler and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and EDS Corporation
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. OLVER et al
as 1:2007cv01646
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
RICHARD (DICK) L. OLVER, MICHAEL J. TURNER, WALTER P. HAVENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Albrecht, Anne, et al v. Com Empl Benefits, et al
as 02-5325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne K. Albrecht, Lillian R. Alston, James August and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits System, Edward W. Kelley, In his capacity as Chairman of the Committee on Employee Benefits, Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., In his capacity as member of the Committee on Employee Benefits and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
