Cases 31 - 39 of 39
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION v. COMPEX CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv01530
Plaintiff:
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION
Defendant:
COMPEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Southeast Alabama Medical Cent v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 08-5156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Southeast Alabama Medical Center, Marshall Medical Center South, Marshall Medical Center North and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael O. Leavitt, Charles E. Johnson and Kathleen Sebelius
NAWA USA, Inc. v. Bottler, Hans-Georg, et al
as 08-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAWA USA, Inc
Defendant - Appellee:
Hans-Georg Bottler, Ferdy Elgi, Bernd Stern and others
COTTON USA, L.P. v. GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION I
as 1:2007cv02331
Plaintiff:
COTTON USA, L.P.
Defendant:
GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION v. WEST COAST FACILITIES INC.
as 1:2007cv01443
Plaintiff:
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION
Defendant:
WEST COAST FACILITIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
EMBASSY OF THE STATE OF KUWAIT v. LEDGER et al
as 1:2007cv00335
Plaintiff:
EMBASSY OF THE STATE OF KUWAIT
Defendant:
GRANT CHRISTOPHER LEDGER and BONDS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION v. SATCOM SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION and INTELSAT, LLC
Defendant:
SATCOM SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION v. 927665 ALBERTA, INC.
as 1:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
INTELSAT USA SALES CORPORATION
Defendant:
927665 ALBERTA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Smith, Richard F., et al v. Mallick, Raj K.
as 06-7179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Richard F. Smith and Marine Carriers (USA), Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Raj K. Mallick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
