Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01985
Plaintiff:
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER , ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. , ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
WILLIAMS v. BLUEPRINT, LLC
as 1:2010cv01763
Plaintiff:
MADIEU WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BLUEPRINT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. WILLIAM V. WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00975
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COST OF WISCONSIN, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Wade Robertson v. William Cartinhour, Jr.
as 10-7033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wade Robertson
Defendant - Appellee:
William C. Cartinhour, Jr.
Wade Robertson v. William Cartinhour, Jr.
as 10-7015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wade Robertson
Defendant - Appellee:
William C. Cartinhour, Jr.
Wade Robertson v. William Cartinhour, Jr.
as 10-7017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wade Robertson
Defendant - Appellee:
William C. Cartinhour, Jr.
Wade Robertson v. William Cartinhour, Jr.
as 10-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wade Robertson
Defendant - Appellee:
William C. Cartinhour, Jr.
RYAN et al v. WALTON et al
as 1:2010cv00145
Plaintiff:
JAMES RYAN, DAVID ALLEN and RONALD SHERMAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM WALTON, JOHN FIRESTONE, ANTHONY GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
COPE et al v. FEDERAL RESERVE et al
as 1:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
REBECCA BROWN COPE, KYLE-DAVID ASEL, CHARLES C. MILLER and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL RESERVE, ERIC S. ROSENGREN, WILLIAM C. DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
