Cases 1 - 10 of 98
ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
SINGING RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM f/k/a SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL d/b/a SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL, PASCAGOULA HOSPITAL, OCEAN SPRING HOSPITAL, SINGING RIVER GULFPORT formerly known as SINGING RIVER HOSPITAL doing business as PASCAGOULA HOSPITAL doing business as, ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., ANMED HEALTH d/b/a ANMED doing business as ANMED and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BILLINGS CLINIC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
BILLINGS CLINIC, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL doing business as BEAUMONT HEALTH - FARMINGTON HILLS, CAMDEN-CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
LUXE HEALTH, INC. v. MERCALIS INC. et al
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
LUXE HEALTH, INC. d/b/a Luxe Health Pharmacy agent of LUXE HEALTH PHARMACY
Defendant:
MERCALIS INC. and PHARMACY DATA MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
TURNER BROTHERS INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
TURNER BROTHERS INC. d/b/a TURNER DRUGS CELEBRATION, ADVANCING HEALTH ACCESS, INC. and TURNER BROTHERS INC. doing business as TURNER DRUGS CELEBRATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MERCALIS INC. f/k/a TRIALCARD INCORPORATED, PHARMACY DATA MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION d/b/a MedStar Washington Hospital Center, MEDSTAR GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER CORPORATION doing business as MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION v. 1215 CT LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
1215 CT LLC d/b/a ROSEBAR LOUNGE, IESHA MARIE CRESPO, ABIGAIL RATCHFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
AHS HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, LLC d/b/a Hillcrest Medical Center doing business as HILLCREST MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH DEER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, HONORHEALTH JOHN C. LINCOLN MEDICAL CENTER doing business as SCOTTSDALE LINCOLN HEALTH NETWORK doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN HOSPITAL-NORTH MOUNTAIN doing business as JOHN C. LINCOLN NORTH MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL doing business as SCOTTSDALE HEALTHCARE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
BANNER HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv03375
Plaintiff:
BANNER HEALTH d/b/a BANNER - UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER PHOENIX, BANNER HEALTH d/b/a BANNER - UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER TUCSON, HARTFORD HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Carol Lewis, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carol A. Lewis and Douglas B. Sargent, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
TITAN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC v. SOMPO INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE et al
as 1:2023cv01077
Not Classified By Court:
USA f/u/b/o TITAN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC, SOMPO INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE and HIGHWAY AND SAFETY SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
TITAN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC
Defendant:
ENDURANCE ASSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
