Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
PALOMAR MEDICAL CENTER ESCONDIDO et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv02954
Plaintiff:
PALOMAR MEDICAL CENTER ESCONDIDO doing business as PALOMAR HEALTH DOWNTOWN CAMPUS, PALOMAR MEDICAL CENTER POWAY formerly doing business as POMERADO HOSPITAL, ESSENTIA HEALTH VIRGINIA, LLC doing business as VIRGINIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
COASTAL CAROLINA MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00970
Plaintiff:
SPALDING REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., PLACENTIA-LINDA HOSPITAL, INC., DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF MANTECA, INC. and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
HETRICK v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE et al
as 1:2015cv01286
Plaintiff:
STEVE IRVIN HETRICK
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE , JUAN GONZALEZ and DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv02006
Plaintiff:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA , UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER , UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01493
Plaintiff:
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA , UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER , UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
