Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HDI GLOBAL SPECIALTY SE v. STANTON VIEW DEVELOPMENTS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
HDI GLOBAL SPECIALTY SE
Defendant:
STANTON VIEW DEVELOPMENTS, LLC, RIVER EAST AT ANACOSTIA, LLC, JERRY VINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. CAPITOL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv03009
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CAPITOL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN, INC., LADONNA MAY, ADE ADENARIWO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
SHORT v. KEY et al
as 1:2020cv02981
Defendant:
HOOK SON EU, STACEY SIN LAY, KOY BANKS and others
Plaintiff:
LATYSHA DENISE SHORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv02063
Defendant:
BRIAN D. KARTH, MAUREEN P. BAIRD, SARA M. REVELL and others
Plaintiff:
GORDON LEROY HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
ASSOCIATED PRODUCERS, LTD et al v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
as 1:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED PRODUCERS, LTD and SIMCHA JACOBOVICI
Defendant:
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY and ROBIN JENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC., v. SEXTON
as 1:2008cv02209
Plaintiff:
ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant:
ROBIN SEXTON
Cause Of Action: Diversity
City of Harper Woods Employees v. Richard (Dick) Olver, et al
as 08-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Harper Woods Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of BAE Systems, PLC.
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard (Dick) L. Olver, Michael J. Turner, Walter P. Havenstein and others
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. OLVER et al
as 1:2007cv01646
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HARPER WOODS EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
RICHARD (DICK) L. OLVER, MICHAEL J. TURNER, WALTER P. HAVENSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
