Intellectual Property Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 86
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2011cv01110
Plaintiff: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Defendant: DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. KAPPOS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01110
Plaintiff: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Defendant: DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
SIMPLY THICK, LLC v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01076
Plaintiff: SIMPLY THICK, LLC
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
JAPAN TOBACCO, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01023
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Plaintiff: JAPAN TOBACCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
MAGNACHEM INTERNATIONAL LABORATORIES, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00892
Plaintiff: MAGNACHEM INTERNATIONAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
SCHERING CORPORATION et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00673
Plaintiff: SCHERING CORPORATION and MERCK & CO., INC.
Defendant: DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
KINAXIS HOLDINGS INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00620
Plaintiff: KINAXIS HOLDINGS INC.
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
TEPHA, INC., v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00580
Plaintiff: TEPHA, INC.,
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION v. THE HONORABLE DAVID J. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00567
Plaintiff: CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION
Defendant: THE HONORABLE DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Michael Kroll v. David Kappos, et al
as 10-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael I. Kroll, Patent Attorney
Defendant - Appellee: David J. Kappos, in his Official Capacity as Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline of the United States Patent and Trademark Office

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?