Cases 61 - 70 of 85
PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02425
Plaintiff:
PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
GORMAN v. CASH BACK REALTY INC. et al
as 1:2009cv02389
Plaintiff:
DAVID GORMAN
Defendant:
CASH BACK REALTY INC. and ANTHONY CASSARO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
KEURIG, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02353
Plaintiff:
KEURIG, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
TRANSTECH PHARMA, INC., v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02305
Plaintiff:
TRANSTECH PHARMA, INC.,
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
TOLERX, INC. et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02255
Plaintiff:
TOLERX, INC., ISIS INNOVATION, LTD. and CAMBRIDGE ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
FRANCE v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02256
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON FRANCE
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SERVIN et al
as 1:2009cv02014
Plaintiff:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JACQUES SERVIN, IGOR VAMOS, SUPPORT AND COMMITMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01969
Plaintiff:
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01965
Plaintiff:
MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED and MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01968
Plaintiff:
MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED and MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
