Cases 131 - 140 of 35,466
EEON et al v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv01626
Plaintiff:
EEON and EEON FOUNDATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALIMARDANI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Plaintiff:
REZA ALIMARDANI and MARYAM NIKBAKHT
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MORA NAMDAR, KRISTINA KVIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TOBIAS v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
JIMMY TOBIAS
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2024cv01060
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
US RIGHT TO KNOW v. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
US RIGHT TO KNOW
Defendant:
DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
USA v. Christopher Quaglin
as 24-3074
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Joseph Quaglin
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NI et al
as 1:2024cv01632
Defendant:
Jian Ming Ni, Zhou Min Ni and Jonathan Ni
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
ZHONG et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2024cv01136
Petitioner:
FEIFEI ZHONG and YILIAN LI
Respondent:
UR M. JADDOU, CORLISS A JOSEPHS-CONWAY and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv01628
Plaintiff:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
