Cases 11 - 20 of 23
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016mc00273
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., JOE NORWOOD, J. HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
BANNUM, INC. v. SAMUELS, JR. et al
as 1:2015cv01233
Plaintiff:
BANNUM, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., CATHERINE SCOTT, TIMOTHY R. BARNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL v. SAMUELS
as 1:2015cv01192
Plaintiff:
WALLACE G. MITCHELL
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PRISON LEGAL NEWS v. SAMUELS
as 1:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
PRISON LEGAL NEWS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Yassin Aref, et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref, Kifah Jayyousi and Daniel McGowan
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisoners, D. Scott Dodrill, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs Division and others
AL KASSAR v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL KASSAR
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and D. SCOTT DODRILL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Mikeal Stine v. Charles Samuels, Jr.
as 15-5062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
HAMPTON v. COMEY et al
as 1:2014cv01641
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, ANNE MARY CARTER, TIMOTHY J. ERVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HAMPTON V. COMEY, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv01607
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, ANNE MARY CARTER, TIMOTHY J. ERVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHOTZ v. SAMUELS
as 1:2013cv01811
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Plaintiff:
BARRY R. SCHOTZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
