Cases 11 - 17 of 17
SOLOMON v. MALLINCKRODT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SOLOMON
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY , MARK TRUDEAU, MATTHEW K. HARBAUGH and others
Movant:
NATALIE AMAYA and GREGORY SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Natalie Ruisi, et al v. NLRB
as 16-1031
Petitioner:
Natalie Ruisi and Michael Peluso
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
FREEMAN v. UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2015mc00701
Plaintiff:
NATALIE J. FREEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
PARKS et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2010cv01460
Plaintiff:
TINA PARKS , J.P. , THOMAS COX, SR. and others
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
MANN et al v. CASTIEL et al
as 1:2009cv02137
Plaintiff:
JOHN B. MANN, MANN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, REGISTRY SOLUTIONS COMPANY and others
Defendant:
DAVID CASTIEL, CAMERAN CASTIEL, ELLIPSO PRIVATE HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Twn New Canaan CT, et al v. FAA, et al
as 08-1105
Petitioner:
Town of New Canaan, Connecticut, Judy A. Neville, Individually and in her official capacity as First Selectman of the Twon of New Canaan, Town of Greenwich, Connecticut and others
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and United States Department of Transportation
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
State of New Jersey
In Re: LORAZEPAM/CLORAZE, et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES, et al
as 1:1999mc00276
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION , STATE OF FLORIDA , STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. , CAMBREX CORPORATION , PROFARMACO S.R.L. and others
Movant:
AETNA US HEALTHCARE , CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STEVEN ARONSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
