Cases 11 - 20 of 174
Safari Club International, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-5362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Safari Club International and National Rifle Association of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior, An agency of the United States, Daniel M. Ashe, In his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Friends of Animals and Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force
Safari Club International, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-5358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Safari Club International and National Rifle Association of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, In Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Daniel M. Ashe, In His Official Capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, An Agency of the United States and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Friends of Animals
Safari Club International, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 16-5362
Defendant / Appellee:
Ryan Zinke, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Greg Sheehan, In his official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Amicus Curiae:
Humane Society International, Center for Biological Diversity, Humane Society of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Safari Club International and National Rifle Association of America
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force and Friends of Animals
MDEWAKANTON SIOUX INDIANS OF MINNESOTA et al v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2016cv02323
Plaintiff:
MDEWAKANTON SIOUX INDIANS OF MINNESOTA , MARGO BELLANGER , TINA JEFFERSON and others
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Stand Up For California!, et al v. DOI, et al
as 16-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stand Up For California!, Randall Brannon, Madera Ministerial Association and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Stand Up For California!, et al v. DOI, et al
as 16-5328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stand Up For California!, Randall Brannon, Madera Ministerial Association and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
AHURUONYE v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2016cv02028
Plaintiff:
BARRY AHURUONYE
Defendant:
PENNY BARTNICKI , KELLY BILLOTIE , MARION CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MOHN v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2016cv01984
Plaintiff:
ABIODUN AYINDE MOHN
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL, MIKE CONNER and JACOB J. LEW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SPRINT CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2016cv01972
Plaintiff:
SPRINT CORPORATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Timothy Mayo, et al v. Jonathan Jarvis, et al
as 16-5282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Mayo and Kent Nelson
Defendant - Appellee:
Jonathan B. Jarvis, Daniel M. Ashe and Sally Jewell
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
State of Wyoming and Safari Club International
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
