Cases 21 - 30 of 493
GREENSPAN v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
AARON GREENSPAN
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEY'S, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GRAND MARINA INVESTORS, LLC v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
GRAND MARINA INVESTORS, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DOUGLAS O'DONNELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Felix Luu v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 23-1149
Petitioner / Appellant:
Felix Luu
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Indu Rawat v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 23-1142
Petitioner / Appellant:
Indu Rawat
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Iowaska Church of Healing v. Daniel Werfel, et al
as 23-5122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Iowaska Church of Healing
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel I. Werfel, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
LAKEPOINT LAND GROUP, LLC v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
LAKEPOINT LAND GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Atm Khalid v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 23-1098
Petitioner / Appellant:
Atm Shafiqul Khalid
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Daniel Villa v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 23-1088
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Allen Villa
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Daniel Villa v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 23-1087
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Allen Villa
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
TWIN-CITY MOTOR COMPANY BUILDING, LLC v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2023cv00687
Not Classified By Court:
TWIN-CITY MOTOR COMPANY BUILDING, LLC and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
