Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 25 of 25
ISLAMIC CENTER OF WASHINGTON, D.C. v. DARUI et al
as 1:2007mc00386
Petitioner: ISLAMIC CENTER OF WASHINGTON, D.C.
Respondent: FARZAD DARUI
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Natl Assn GovtR5-136 v. FLRA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 03-1127
Petitioner: National Association of Government Employees, Local R5-136
Respondent: Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C.
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: National Treasury Employees Union
Students Agnst, et al v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 99-5316
Plaintiff - Appellant: Students Against Genocide, Coalition for Intervention Against Genocide, Inc., A Delaware not-for-profit Corporation, Human Rights Watch and others
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of State, United States Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency
Shook, Karen, et al v. DC Fincl Respsble We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 97-7087
Plaintiff - Appellant: Karen Shook, Benjamin Bonham, Sandra Butler-Truesdale and others
Plaintiff: Robert Childs, Rev. and Wilma R. Harvey
Defendant - Appellee: D.C. Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Missionary Baptist Ministers Conference for Washington D.C. and Vicinity, District of Columbia Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, Coalition for Political and Financial Accountability and others
Old Twn Trolley v. WMATC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 96-1069
Petitioner: Old Town Trolley Tours of Washington, Inc.
Terminated Party: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Respondent: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Intervenor: Double Decker Bus Tours W.D.C., Inc., trading as Double Decker Bus Washington, D.C.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?