Cases 31 - 40 of 1,655
GHANDILI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
NAVID GHANDILI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, RAFIQ MANSOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KURDISTAN VICTIMS FUND et al v. KURDISTAN REGIONAL GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Kurdistan Victims Fund, Maki Revend and JOHN DOES
Defendant:
KURDISTAN REGIONAL GOVERNMENT OF IRAQ, Masoud Barzani, Masrour Barzani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALFAISALI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
MOQBEL AHMED ALFAISALI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JONATHAN POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATEL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
YOGESHKUMAR BALDEVBHAI PATEL
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, MIKE HANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
NADA et al v. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
HAZIM NADA and LORD ENERGY SA
Defendant:
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, ARIAF STUDIES AND RESEARCH LLC, ABU DHABI NATIONAL OIL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DABNEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
JOHN DABNEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and D.C. OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Christopher Worrell
as 24-3002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher John Worrell
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5010
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
