Cases 31 - 40 of 103
AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY KSCP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2016cv01837
Plaintiff:
AGILITY PUBLIC WAREHOUSING COMPANY KSCP
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ASHTON B. CARTER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01610
Plaintiff:
GRANT F. SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN O. BRENNAN, ASHTON B. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
HUNTCO PAWN HOLDINGS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2016cv01433
Plaintiff:
HUNTCO PAWN HOLDINGS, LLC and NATIONAL PAWNBROKERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and ASHTON B. CARTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Huntco Pawn Holdings, LLC v. DOD, et al
as 16-1240
Petitioner:
Huntco Pawn Holdings, LLC, d/b/a Pawn King
Respondent:
United States Department of Defense and Ashton B. Carter, Secretary of Defense
Jerome Hampton v. James Comey, et al
as 16-5058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jerome Hampton
Defendant - Appellee:
James B. Comey, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, Anne Mary Carter, BOP Warden, Morgantown, West Virginia, Timothy J. Ervin, FBI Special Agent and others
NEVILLE v. YANG et al
as 1:2015cv01032
Respondent:
JENNY R. YANG, ASH CARTER, DEBORAH L. JAMES and others
Petitioner:
TINA NEVILLE
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KINKAID v. MCDONALD et al
as 1:2015cv00797
Petitioner:
STANLEY G. KINKAID
Respondent:
ROBERT A. MCDONALD and ASH CARTER
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
ALI MOMAREZ et al v. KERRY et al
as 1:2015cv00516
Defendant:
JOHN KERRY and ASHTON CARTER
Plaintiff:
SAFFA ABDUL ELTAIEB , AWHEAD ALMARQOZI , AHMED ABDULLA MOHAMED and others
Petitioner:
ABDULLA SAAIDI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
In re: Cynthia Artis, et al
as 14-8003
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Cynthia Artis, Sharon Logan, Sharon Ellis and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
