Cases 31 - 38 of 38
ROBINSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ROBINSON , ANTHNOY PRICE , BERNICE BROWN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
STARLING v. LAWSON
as 1:2011cv02080
Plaintiff:
EDWARD STARLING
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLIARD v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, et al.,
as 1:2010cv00783
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MICHAEL HILLIARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, LYNN N. HUGHES, MELINDA HARMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2010cv00659
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED and BJ SERVICES COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
LAIL et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LAIL, IRENE SANTACROCE, JAMES B. SPENCER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, PAUL GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
VAN RAVENSWAAY v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv01455
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. VAN RAVENSWAAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, MICHAEL MUKASEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HUGHES v. FINKEL et al
as 1:2008cv00236
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CHARLES HUGHES
Defendant:
PAMELA BLUM FINKEL, KEITH SCHAFER, RICHARD GOWDY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ERNEST K. LEHMANN & ASSOCIATES OF MONTANA, INC. et al v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2007cv00762
Plaintiff:
ERNEST K. LEHMANN & ASSOCIATES OF MONTANA, INC. and MOUNT ROYAL JOINT VENTURE
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, C. STEPHEN ALLRED, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
