Cases 31 - 40 of 45
In re: Jeremy Pinson, et al
as 14-5139
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Jeremy Pinson, Jamil Addullah Al-Amin, Q Ili-Yaas Haakeem Farrakhan-Muhammad and others
:
Yuksel Celikgogus, et al v. Donald Rumsfeld, et al
as 13-5097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yuksel Celikgogus, Ibrahim Sen, Nuri Mert and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald H. Rumsfeld, Former Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, Richard Myers, General, Former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Geoffrey Miller, Major General, Former Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Timothy Pigford, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 12-5302
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Timothy C. Pigford, Lloyd Shafer, George Hall and others
Movant - Appellant:
Muhammad Robbalaa
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
USA v. Muhammad Hussain
as 12-3021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Muhammad Abid Hussain, also known as Abid
MUHAMMAD v. MOTOROLA INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2011cv01670
Plaintiff:
ESA MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MOTOROLA INCORPORATED and MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01674
Plaintiff:
ESA MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AHMED et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2011cv00538
Plaintiff:
WAHEED AHMED , ASMA WAHEED , MUHAMMAD AYZAD WAHEED AWAN and others
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS and JACK LIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
MUHAMMAD v. CIA et al
as 1:2010cv00948
Plaintiff:
FARAUD K. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CIA, TIM MOORE, GENERAL SERGEANT TO THE CIA IN ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2010cv00707
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GOOBY MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
