Cases 31 - 40 of 60
INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. v. BOHR et al
as 1:2012mc00151
Petitioner:
INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. BOHR, LOIS B. EPPS, JAMES M. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
CARTER v. BUSH et al
as 1:2011cv01676
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2011cv01366
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, LEON PENETTA, RALPH BASHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLBERT v. CLINTON
as 1:2011cv01114
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
HILLARY CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
FERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01097
Plaintiff:
LUIS ALBERTO FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE , HILLARY CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
AKERE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv01015
Plaintiff:
MUBARAQ TOPE AKERE
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, UNITED STATES SENATE, US REPRESENTATIVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBAMA-CARTER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2011cv00783
Plaintiff:
AUDREY OBAMA-CARTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, BARACK OBAMA, GEORGE BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AEM (HOLDINGS), INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv01942
Plaintiff:
AEM (HOLDINGS), INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MALONE v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2010cv01900
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES M. MALONE
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. CLINTON, AL GORE, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv01826
Plaintiff:
JOAN FRANCES M. MALONE
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, JOSEPH BIDEN, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
