Cases 41 - 50 of 397
ISOM v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv03392
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
ANTHONY BLINKEN, JAPAN HEALTH POLICY NOW and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ISOM v. MCGOUGH et al
as 1:2022cv03388
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
ADAM MCGOUGH, ANTHONY BLINKEN, GENARO GARCIA LUNA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Anthony Mazzio, Jr.
as 22-3079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Michael Mazzio, Jr.
USA v. Anthony Williams
as 22-3067
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Robert Williams
GHARAVI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2022cv02550
Plaintiff:
SAM GHARAVI and SEYED MANOUCHEHR GHARAVI
Defendant:
ANTHONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
NGUYEN et al v. UDALL et al
as 1:2022cv02396
Plaintiff:
TU CAM NGUYEN and Nga Tuyet HOANG
Defendant:
TOM UDALL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES CONSULATE GENERAL IN AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
PEEVSKI et al v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2022cv02334
Plaintiff:
DELYAN SLAVCHEV PEEVSKI, INT LTD EEOD, INTRUST PLC EAD and others
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ANDREA M. GACKI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Steven Heller, et al v. Republic of Hungary
as 22-7112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Anthony Heller and Charles William Heller
Defendant / Appellee:
Republic of Hungary
CASTRO v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY CASTRO and JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
