Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Rosemary Love, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 15-5156
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rosemary Love, Lind Marie Bara-Weaver, Margaret Odom and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
Movant - Appellant:
Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association, Inc.
George Keepseagle, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 15-5011
Plaintiff - Appellee:
George B. Keepseagle, Luther Crasco, John Fredericks, III and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Timothy Labatte
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
Movant - Appellant:
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and Jones Academy Foundation
George Keepseagle, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 14-5223
Plaintiff - Appellee:
George B. Keepseagle, Luther Crasco, John Fredericks, III and others
Movant - Appellant:
Timothy Labatte
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
Rosemary Love, et al v. Thomas Vilsack
as 14-5185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rosemary Love, Lind Marie Bara-Weaver, Margaret Odom and others
Movant - Appellant:
Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
Rosalie Simon, et al v. Republic of Hungary, et al
as 14-7082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosalie Simon, Helen Herman, Charlotte Weiss and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Republic of Hungary, Magyar Allamvasutak Zrt., (MAV ZRT.) and Rail Cargo Hungaria Zrt., Successor-in-interest to MAV CARGO ARUFUVAROZASI ZRT. a division of MAV Zrt., formerly known as Mav Cargo Zrt.
In re: Harman International
as 14-7017
In Re:
In re: Harman International Industries, Inc. Securities Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cheolan Kim, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Simiarly Situated and City Of Boca Raton General Employees Pension Plan, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated - (CA-07-2175)
Defendant - Appellee:
Harman International Industries Inc., Sidney Harman, DR., Kevin Brown and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System, (CA-07-2175)
National ATM Council, Inc., et al v. Visa Inc., et al
as 14-7006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National ATM Council, Inc., ATMS of the South, Inc., Business Resource Group, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa Inc., Visa International Service Association and others
Mary Stoumbos v. Visa Inc., et al
as 14-7005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Stoumbos, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa Inc., Visa International Service Association, Visa Inc. and others
In re: Livingsocial Marketing
as 13-7062
In Re:
In re: Livingsocial Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation- Mdl No. 2254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Melissa Forshey, Who resides at 930 M Street, NW, Washington DC, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Mandy Miller, on behalf of Herself and all others similarly situated, Kimberly Pullman, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and the general public and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Living Social, Inc., Jack's Canoes & Kayaks, LLC, doing business as Jack's Boathouse, Does, 1-100 and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Michelle Melton and Cery Perle
In re: Livingsocial Marketing
as 13-7059
In Re:
In re: Livingsocial Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation- Mdl No. 2254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Melissa Forshey, Who resides at 930 M Street, NW, Washington DC, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Mandy Miller, on behalf of Herself and all others similarly situated, Kimberly Pullman, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and the general public and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Living Social, Inc., Jack's Canoes & Kayaks, LLC, doing business as Jack's Boathouse, Does, 1-100 and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Jeremy De La Garza
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
