Cases 41 - 50 of 62
REAVES et al v. BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, SARAH SIMON-ARNOLD, ROGER ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv00841
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS , ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ROBERTSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
TIJUANA ROBERTSON , D.R. , BESSIE THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Martha's Vineyard/Dukes County, et al v. John E. Bryson, et al
as 11-5311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martha's Vineyard/Dukes County Fisherman's Association and Michael S. Flaherty
Defendant - Appellee:
Gary F. Locke, Secretary of the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
SHELLEY et al v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 1:2011cv00677
Plaintiff:
RICH SHELLEY, JAMES OZANIAN and LANCE COLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
City of Jersey City, et al v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
as 10-7135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Jersey City, Rails to Trails Conservancy and Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition
Defendant - Appellee:
Consolidated Rail Corporation
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
212 Marin Boulevard, L.L.C., 247 Manila Avenue, L.L.C., 280 Erie Street, L.L.C. and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Paula T. Dow, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
BOYKIN et al v. FENTY
as 1:2010cv01790
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOYKIN , LAMONT CALDWELL , PAUL COLE and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
