Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. FERC
as 15-1121
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority, Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Emera Maine, et al v. FERC
as 15-1118
Petitioner:
Emera Maine, formerly known as Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, Central Maine Power Company, New England Power Company, doing business as National Grid and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 15-5060
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire, State of North Dakota, State of Colorado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, State of Michigan, National Rifle Association of America and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and State of Wisconsin
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Help Our Wolves Live, Born Free USA, Humane Society of the United States and others
Humane Society of the United, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 15-5061
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
State of Michigan and Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire, State of North Dakota, State of Colorado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
National Rifle Association of America, U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation, Michigan Hunting Dog Federation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Help Our Wolves Live, Born Free USA, Humane Society of the United States and others
Humane Society of the US, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 15-5041
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Michigan United Conservation Clubs, Michigan Hunting Dog Federation and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New Hampshire, State of North Dakota, State of Colorado and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Michigan Department of Natural Resources, State of Michigan, State of Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Born Free USA, Help Our Wolves Live, Humane Society of the United States and others
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 14-5247
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Movant - Appellant:
Daniel J. Levitan
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC.
as 1:2014cv01028
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU , STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU et al v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv02025
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLEMAN v. TOWN OF LEE, NEW HAMPSHIRE et al
as 1:2013cv00877
Plaintiff:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant:
TOWN OF LEE, NEW HAMPSHIRE, TOWN OF LEE, NEW HAMPSHIRE BOARD OF SELECTMAN, LEE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
