Cases 51 - 60 of 66
BARBA et al v. SEUNG HEUN LEE, et al.,
as 1:2012mc00568
Petitioner:
RICARDO BARBA, LILY CHRISTIAN, HEATHER CLEARY and others
Movant:
LUCIE VOGEL
Respondent:
SEUNG HEUN LEE , JOURNG SOOK LEE , DAHN YOGA & HEALTH CENTERS INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PEARSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PEARSON , J. P. , CLEO MOSLEY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
MELVIN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MELVIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE OVERSIGHT AND COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MATTIACCIO v. DHA GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01249
Plaintiff:
GENNARO MATTIACCIO, II
Defendant:
DHA GROUP, INC. , AMI GETU and DAVID HALE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SCHMIT v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2012cv00784
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR and AMY DUTSCHKE
Plaintiff:
CHERYL SCHMIT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
STRONG et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00353
Plaintiff:
MICAIAH STRONG , M. S. , DORIS WOOD and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
SCHULTZ v. HUNGRY MACHINE, INC.
as 1:2011cv01697
Plaintiff:
AMY SCHULTZ
Defendant:
HUNGRY MACHINE, INC.
IN RE: LIVINGSOCIAL MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION- MDL NO. 2254
as 1:2011mc00472
Plaintiff:
MELISSA FORSHEY , MANDY MILLER , KIMBERLY PULLMAN and others
Defendant:
LIVING SOCIAL, INC. , JACK'S CANOES AND KAYAKS, LLC, DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
TORJMAN v. GUTMANN et al
as 1:2011cv01060
Plaintiff:
MIREILLE TORJMAN
Defendant:
AMY GUTMANN, CAROL CORILLON, HARVEY FINEBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
