Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 77
RICHARDSON et al v. AZKO NOBEL, INC.
as 1:2009cv02112
Defendant: MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, CHINOOK GLOBAL LIMITED, EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, KIRK CHAFFEE, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
State of Nevada v. NRC
as 09-1133
Petitioner: State of Nevada
Respondent: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent: Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc.
State of Nevada v. EPA, et al
as 08-1345
Petitioner: State of Nevada
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, Lisa Perez Jackson and others
State of Nevada v. EPA
as 08-1327
Petitioner: State of Nevada
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc.
County of Delaware, Pennsylvan v. DOT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1385
Petitioner: County of Delaware, Pennsylvania, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Andrew J. Reilly, individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of the Delaware County Council, Linda A. Cartisano, individually and in her official capacity as Vice-Chair of the Delaware County Council and others
Respondent: United States Department of Transportation, Mary E. Peters, Secretary of Transportation, Raymond L. LaHood, Secretary of Transportation and others
Rambus Incorporated v. FTC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1086
Petitioner: Rambus Incorporated
Respondent: Federal Trade Commission
Amicus Curiae: S. M. Oliva
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., JEDEC Solid State Technology Association, State of Ohio and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Hewlett Packard Co., Cisco Systems Inc., Sun Microsystems, Inc. and others
Clark Cty NV v. FAA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1377
Petitioner: Clark County, Nevada, A Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada
Respondent: Federal Aviation Administration
USA v. Council for Tobacco Research, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-5267
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America, United States Department of Justice
Intervenor - Appellee: American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association and others
Defendant - Appellee: Philip Morris USA Inc., formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Directly and as successor by merger to AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellant: British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Directly and as Successor to BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, LTD
Special Master - Appellee: Richard A. Levie
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Public Citizen, Inc., American College of Preventive Medicine and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Washington Legal Foundation, National Association of Manufacturers and National Association of Convenience Stores
Amicus Curiae: Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Lung Cancer Alliance, Community Anti-Drug Coalition of America and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Citizens' Commission to Protect the Truth
Ohngo Gaudadeh Devia v. NRC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1419
Petitioner: Ohngo Gaudadeh Devia
Respondent: Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent: Private Fuel Storage, L.L.C. and Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: State of Nevada
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Nuclear Energy Institute
Terminated Party: William D. Peterson
St NV v. DOE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-1309
Petitioner: State of Nevada
Respondent: United States Department of Energy
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?