Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,742
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00837
Not Yet Classified: APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DMV CONVENIENCE, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01133
Plaintiff: DMV Convenience, Inc.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Judicial Review of Admin Determination by DOA
USA v. Michael Foy
as 24-3042
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Michael Joseph Foy
USA v. Taylor Johnatakis
as 24-3043
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Taylor James Johnatakis
USA v. Charles Clark
as 24-3041
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Charles Clark
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MONUMENT, INC.
as 1:2024cv01034
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MONUMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR TWO APPLE ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
as 1:2024ml00773
Not Yet Classified: APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR TWO APPLE ACCOUNTS SERVICED BY APPLE INC.
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR ILLICIT CONTENT INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00764
Not Yet Classified: APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR ILLICIT CONTENT INVESTIGATION
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Adam Steele, et al v. USA
as 24-5076
Plaintiff: Adam Steele and Krystal Comer
Defendant: United States of America
USA v. Kyle Mlynarek
as 24-3040
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Kyle Alan Mlynarek

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?