Cases 61 - 70 of 122
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2013cv00161
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and THOMAS HARRIGAN
Plaintiff:
DON E. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
DON E. JONES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and ADRIANA GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
TORRANCE JONES
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Cambrex Charles City, Inc. v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-1009
Petitioner:
Cambrex Charles City, Inc.
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Michele M. Leonhart, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Vincent Marino v. CIA, et al
as 12-5325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Michael Marino
Defendant - Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency and others
Walgreen Company v. DEA
as 12-1397
Petitioner:
Walgreen Company
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
ASKANAZI v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2012cv01284
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ASKANAZI
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In Re: DISCOVERY ORDER IN THE MATTER OF I.R.
as 1:2012mc00284
Petitioner:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Respondent:
I.R.
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
In Re: DISCOVERY ORDER IN THE MATTER OF T.C.
as 1:2012mc00285
Petitioner:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Respondent:
T.C.
DUNSTON v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2012cv00653
Plaintiff:
RODERICK DUNSTON
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
