Cases 71 - 80 of 168
Wadner Polynice v. USA, et al
as 19-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wadner Polynice
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
HARRISON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00269
Defendant:
VUKELICH, ERIC WILSON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NORDLICHT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv02626
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff:
MARK NORDLICHT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FENWICK v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv02509
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
THELMA FENWICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv02399
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BUZZFEED INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv01556
Plaintiff:
BUZZFEED INC.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ANDERSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv00617
Plaintiff:
MELVIN ANDERSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
TURNER v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv00273
Plaintiff:
KEVIN TURNER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and FCI GILMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BARTELHO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2017cv02627
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. BARTELHO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DENT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02502
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CRIMINAL DIVISION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
