Cases 71 - 80 of 1,661
RAHMANIAN SHAHRI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02786
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD REZA RAHMANIAN SHAHRI, RAZIEH KHODABAKHSH and RYAN RAHMANIAN SHAHRI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ROBERT P. SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HANNA v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02799
Plaintiff:
SAMER AHMED HANNA
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, YAEL LEMPERT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MUSSINGTON et al v. DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 1:2023mc00093
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02746
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Barbara Sopkin v. John Lopatto, III
as 23-7115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barbara Sopkin
Defendant / Appellee:
John S. Lopatto, III
KALIL v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv02657
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. KALIL
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TROY A. MILLER and DAVID P. PEKOSKE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
TEGNA INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023mc00087
In Re:
TEGNA INC. doing business as WUSA9
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAUREN HANDY, JOHN HINSHAW and others
R.A. et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv02606
Plaintiff:
R.A., H.A., L.A. and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
DEAN v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv02518
Petitioner:
HESHAM DEAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LEEPER v. LEEPER et al
as 1:2023cv02550
Petitioner:
MARIE KRISTI LEEPER
Respondent:
WILLIAM PATRICK LEEPER, EVAN DOBBS, TIMOTHY FITZGERALD and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTI MARIE LEEPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
