Cases 71 - 77 of 77
D.W. et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2007cv01241
Plaintiff:
D.W. and MARIAN MURPHY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
HUBBARD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
MURPHY M. HUBBARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Pickett, James
as 03-3018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
James Joseph Pickett
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
American Civil Liberties Union of the National Captial Area
Amicus Curiae:
Glen Alonso, Roy C. Anderson, Troy M. Arida and others
Fontana, John L., et al v. White, Thomas, et al
as 01-5383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John L. Fontana, Lieutenant Colonel and Kevin P. Murphy, Lieutenant Colonel
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas E. White, Secretary of the Army
Murphy Expl Prodn Co v. DOI, et al
as 00-5218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Murphy Exploration and Production Company
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of the Interior and Bruce C. Babbitt
City of Los Angeles, et al v. DOT, et al
as 98-1071
Petitioner:
City of Los Angeles, City Los Angeles Department of Airports and Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation, Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of Transportation and Patrick V. Murphy, iDeputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Airports Council International - North America
Intervenor For Respondent:
Air Transport Association of America, Air Canada Airlines, Air New Zealand Limited and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
