Cases 1 - 10 of 1,258
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01702
Plaintiff:
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER and REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
AL NAQEEB v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED KADHIM AL NAQEEB
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DAVID BURGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Susan Seltzer v. Michael Lieder, et al
as 24-7071
Plaintiff:
Susan Seltzer
Defendant:
Michael David Lieder, Ameriprise, formerly known as American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., Edward B. Magarian and others
Saad Khalid v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
Saad Bin Khalid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity, only, Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, only, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE et al v. HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, MILDRED FERN BURLEY, SILVIA FAWN BURLEY and others
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, BRYAN NEWLAND, AMY DUTSCHKE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WIRTZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA WIRTZ, DAVID WIRTZ, FRANCES WIRTZ and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC., ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
