Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 466
HOLLAND et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff: NELLY A. BRAGINSKY, MARGARET A. MICCIULLI, PETER PETROCELLI and others
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JANET L. YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff: RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant: STEPHEN J LUCZO, WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02395
Defendant: CYNTHIA B TAYLOR, AT&T SERVICES, INC., RAPHAEL KUBLER and others
Plaintiff: VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
GONDERE v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff: DANIEL T. GONDERE
Defendant: UR M. JADDOU, MERRICK B. GARLAND and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Daniel Goodwyn
as 24-3093
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Daniel Goodwyn
PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
as 1:2024cv01999
Plaintiff: DANIEL PHILLIPS
Defendant: UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
USA v. Daniel Kingery
as 24-3088
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Daniel Melzine Kingery
HARTENSTINE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 1:2024cv01838
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Petitioner: DANIEL O. HARTENSTINE
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01676
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LADER v. UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv01387
Plaintiff: DANIEL M. LADER
Defendant: UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?