Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Adam Schiff, et al
as 20-5300
Defendant / Appellee:
Rod J. Rosenstein, Former United States Deputy Attorney General, in his individual capacity only, Adam Schiff, Representative, United States Congress; in his individual capacity only, Does #1-7 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., Pharaoh & Priest for the Commonwealth of Israel et al
Andrew McCabe v. William Barr, et al
as 19-5281
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Andrew Christenson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Andrew McCabe
DABAR v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv01479
Plaintiff:
AHMED ABDI DABAR
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
OLABODE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
SHERIFF OLABODE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
SABIA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv01062
Plaintiff:
EIAD SABIA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES , JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
LAWAL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv01010
Plaintiff:
NURUDEEN A. LAWAL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
