Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Saad Khalid v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
Saad Bin Khalid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity, only, Christopher A. Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, only, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
KHALID v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021cv02307
Plaintiff:
Saad Bin Khalid
Not Classified By Court:
MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Mohamed Seraji v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-5007
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, In his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, David P. Pekoske, In his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, Charles H. Kable, IV, In his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mohamed Al Seraji, An individual
Mohammed Jibril, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5202
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher A. Wray, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Charles H. Kable, IV, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, David P. Pekoske, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ala'a Jibril, individually, Mohammed Jibril, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J., Aida Shahin, individually, and on behalf of their minor children Y.J., and O.J. and others
PERALES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2019cv03315
Defendant:
DONALD ALWAY, JEREMY WILTZ, GREGORY D. COX and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
