Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BETZ v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
NA'EEM BETZ
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. HOURANI
as 1:2015cv01724
Plaintiff:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
ISSAM SALAH HOURANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Tennis Channel, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 15-1067
Petitioner:
The Tennis Channel, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Comcast Cable Communications, v. FCC, et al
as 13-1266
Petitioner:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
In re: Cox Communications, Inc., et al
as 12-8011
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Cox Communications, Inc., Verizon Online, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC and others
:
Comcast Cable Communications, v. FCC, et al
as 12-1337
Petitioner:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
CP PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
as 1:2012mc00381
Plaintiff:
CP PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
BUBBLE GUM PRODUCTIONS, LLC v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
as 1:2012mc00382
Plaintiff:
BUBBLE GUM PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
SUNLUST PICTURES, LLC v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
as 1:2012mc00383
Plaintiff:
SUNLUST PICTURES, LLC
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
SUNLUST PICTURES, LLC v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 1:2012mc00380
Plaintiff:
SUNLUST PICTURES, LLC
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
