Cases 1 - 10 of 275
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02395
Defendant:
CYNTHIA B TAYLOR, AT&T SERVICES, INC., RAPHAEL KUBLER and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BROOKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GREGORY BROOKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WALLERSTEIN v. EXIT REALTY CORP INTERNATIONAL
as 1:2024cv01653
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WALLERSTEIN
Defendant:
EXIT REALTY CORP INTERNATIONAL
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Janviere Carlin, et al v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, et al
as 24-5037
Plaintiff:
Janviere Carlin, Jeffery Chandler, Beth Ellis and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Department of Health and Human Services
Deafueh Monbo v. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, et al
as 24-7002
Plaintiff:
Deafueh Monbo
Defendant:
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland and Gregory Wells, in his official capacity
WALLERSTEIN v. YATES et al
as 1:2023cv03739
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY WALLERSTEIN and MELVIN YATES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CHAN v. MAY
as 1:2023cv03248
Plaintiff:
WING TING CHAN
Defendant:
GREGORY MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PODLUCKY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03216
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2023mc00106
Receiver:
GREGORY S. MILLIGAN
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
KEVIN B. MERRILL, JAY B. LEDFORD, CAMERON R. JEZIERSKI and others
PODLUCKY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02975
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
