Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Inez Qtaish v. Steven Malman, et al
as 24-7029
Plaintiff:
Inez Qtaish
Defendant:
Steven J. Malman and Phillip L Radmer
QTAISH v. MALMAN et al
as 1:2023cv03478
Plaintiff:
INEZ QTAISH
Defendant:
STEVEN J. MALMAN and PHILLIP L RADMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUDSON et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
ROY P. HUDSON, JR., DEREK J. UNDERWOOD, STEVEN R. HEISHMAN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LLOYD AUSTIN, WILLIAM LAPLANTE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
1923 9TH STREET CONDOMINIUM v. MOMENTUX RE HOLDINGS, LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
1923 9TH STREET CONDOMINIUM
Defendant:
MOMENTUX RE HOLDINGS, LLC., JUMP LIVING DC, LLC. and JACKSON PHILLIP MOSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Phillips 66 Company v. FERC, et al
as 23-1043
Petitioner:
Phillips 66 Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
CERTAIN ROBOTIC POOL CLEANERS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF et al v. PICHON
as 1:2023mc00009
Petitioner:
WYBOTICS CO. LTD doing business as WINNY POOL CLEANER formerly known as TIANJIN WANGYUAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND TECHNOLOGY, TIANJIN WANGYUAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND TECHNOLOGY, TIANJIN POOL & SPA CORPORATION and others
In Re:
CERTAIN ROBOTIC POOL CLEANERS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
Respondent:
PHILLIPE PICHON
PHILLIPS v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv03810
Plaintiff:
DEANTE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES AGENCY, DEBORAH ISRAEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABERNATHY et al v. CARLYLE GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03603
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABERNATHY, CEDRICK ARTHUR, LARRY BESS and others
Defendant:
The Carlyle Group, Inc., MANTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phillips 66 Company v. FERC, et al
as 22-1248
Petitioner:
Phillips 66 Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
