Cases 1 - 8 of 8
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2021mc00025
Intervenor:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 1:2018cv02553
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 1208
NATIONAL STAR ROUTE MAIL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2016cv02350
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL STAR ROUTE MAIL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor_defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
as 1:2014cv01847
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SHELLEY et al v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 1:2011cv00677
Plaintiff:
RICH SHELLEY, JAMES OZANIAN and LANCE COLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2009cv00237
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01214
Petitioner:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH and JOHN E. POTTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv00990
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO and CONSUMER ALLIANCE FOR POSTAL SERVICES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MAILERS TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 05:App. 2,1 Federal Advisory Committee Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
