Cases 1 - 10 of 283
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
COMMITTEE FOR CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORRO, THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE, CRAIG RUCKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF OCEAN MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ASHOUR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED ASHOUR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, NEW ORLEANS ASYLUM OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Peter Navarro
as 24-3006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Peter K. Navarro
Peter Williams v. EPA, et al
as 23-1340
Petitioner:
Peter Williams
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, in his official capacity
SENTER et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SENTER, THOMAS BROWN, JESSE ANDRE and others
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AGOFSKY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
SHANNON AGOFSKY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Peter Schwartz
as 23-3075
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Peter Schwartz, also known as Peter J. Schwartz
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
MST SORAYA AKTHER and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, RICHARD C. VISEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Peter Navarro
as 23-5062
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Peter K. Navarro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
