Cases 11 - 20 of 21
ATTKISSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01437
Plaintiff:
SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON , JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON and SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., PATRICK R. DONAHOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLLINS et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2015cv00566
Plaintiff:
FLOYD J. COLLINS and ADOL T. OWEN-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CONNOR v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2013cv01877
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CONNOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MCKOY-SHIELDS et al v. FINMARC MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01419
Plaintiff:
SALLIE MCKOY-SHIELDS , FIRST WASHINGTON REALITY and GOOD HOPE MARKETPLACE, L.P.
Defendant:
FINMARC MANAGEMENT, INC., UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and KODIAK PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GREEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv02148
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD GREEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE , PATRICK R. DONAHOE and DARYL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
RICE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv00935
Plaintiff:
CORNELIA RICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Douglas McLaren v. USPS
as 10-5017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Douglas McLaren
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
MCLAREN v. US POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2009cv01615
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MCLAREN
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WILLIAMS v. POTTER et al
as 1:2009cv01170
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN E. POTTER, CAPITAL METRO AREA U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and TERRY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Desiree Green v. United States Postal Service
as 09-5013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Desiree Green
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
