Cases 21 - 28 of 28
IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009
as 1:2010mc00314
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FORT TOTTEN METRORAIL CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JUNE 22, 2009
Plaintiff:
DAVONNE FLANAGAN, DAWN FLANAGAN, IMHOTEP YAKUB and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ARINC, INC., ALSTOM SIGNALING, INC. and others
Interested Party:
DAVID BOTTOMS
Petitioner:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHR, INC. and AIRSEP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BELL v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2009cv01488
Plaintiff:
BERNEA BELL
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Kareemah Bell-Boston v. Superior Court for the D.C.
as 09-7001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kareemah Bell-Boston
Defendant - Appellee:
Superior Court for the District of Columbia
BELL-BOSTON v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2008cv02240
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kareemah Bell-Boston v. Natosha Dorcey
as 08-7088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kareemah Bell-Boston
Defendant - Appellee:
Natosha Dorcey, Harriet Tubman Woman's 12 Hour Low Barier Shelter
BELL v. DORCEY
as 1:2008cv01368
Plaintiff:
KAREEMAH BELL
Defendant:
NATOSHA DORCEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BONK et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2008cv01273
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE BONK, CATHERINE BONK, CATHERINE BONK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BELL v. MEDTRONIC INC
as 1:2007cv00464
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BELL
Defendant:
MEDTRONIC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
