Cases 31 - 36 of 36
SINGH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv01615
Plaintiff:
MAHINDER SINGH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , RAJ K. DOHARE and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MOORE et al v. JOHN AND JANE DOES
as 1:2007cv01793
Plaintiff:
SANDRA IRENE MOORE and JACOB FRANZ DYCK
Defendant:
JP MORGAN-CHASE BANK and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CLARK v. TIDEWATER MACK, INC. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2007cv00883
Plaintiff:
JOAN CLARK
Defendant:
TIDEWATER MACK, INC., G&H SALES ASSOCIATES, INC., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MICKLE vs. BRECKINRIDGE ET AL
as 1:2006cv02238
Plaintiff:
LOLITA MICKLE and LOLITA MICKLE
Defendant:
ANGELO BRECKINRIDGE, TIM REID, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Foretich, Eric A. v. Amer Bcast Co Inc, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 99-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric A. Foretich
Defendant - Appellee:
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Capital City/American Broadcasting Co., Inc., ABC Holding Company and others
Appellee:
John C. Lenahan
Richardson, Roy Dale v. USA, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 98-5176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roy Dale Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Appointed Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.