Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Kevin So v. Leonard Suchanek
as 10-7113
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin So
Defendant - Appellant:
Leonard J. Suchanek, Esquire
Kevin So v. Leonard Suchanek
as 10-7087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin So
Defendant - Appellee:
Leonard J. Suchanek, Esquire
Kevin So v. Leonard Suchanek
as 10-7071
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kevin So
Defendant - Appellant:
Leonard J. Suchanek, Esquire
FLEMENS v. DIGGS
as 1:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FLEMENS
Defendant:
FRANK O. DIGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WANDEL v. KEVIN DOCKETT & SONS TRUCKING, INC et al
as 1:2009cv01246
Plaintiff:
CORA L. WANDEL
Defendant:
KEVIN DOCKETT & SONS TRUCKING, INC, KEVIN DOCKETT SR TRUCKING INC. and MARVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DYSARCZYK et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
DARLENE DYSARCZYK and KEVIN DYSARCZYK
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SO v. SUCHANEK
as 1:2008cv02091
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SO
Defendant:
LEONARD J. SUCHANEK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LIBERTY et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2008cv01281
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE LOUISE LIBERTY, CHRISTINE LOUISE LIBERTY, CHRISTINE LOUISE LIBERTY and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BONK et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2008cv01273
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE BONK, CATHERINE BONK, CATHERINE BONK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02291
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. MILLER, JAMES MILLER, THOMASINA MINOR and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
