Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Abdul Mohammed v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 23-5293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Easterbrook, Hon., Vanita Gupta, Merrick B. Garland and others
MOHAMMED v. EASTERBROOK et al
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
FRANK EASTERBROOK, VANITA GUPTA, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James Owens, et al v. BNP Paribas, S.A., et al
as 17-7037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Owens, Gary Robert Owens, Estate of Betty Owens Evely, By and through its personal representative, Gary Robert Owens and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BNP Paribas, S.A., BNP Paribas North America, Inc. and BNP Paribas (Suisse) S.A.
OWENS et al v. BNP PARIBAS S.A. et al
as 1:2015cv01945
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS , GARY ROBERT OWENS , ESTATE OF BETTY OWENS EVELY and others
Defendant:
BNP PARIBAS, S.A. , BNP PARIBAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and BNP PARIBAS (SUISSE) S.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
BARNES v. DOBY-EVELY et al
as 1:2011cv01269
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
NNEKA DOBY-EVELY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ELLISON v. AM & EVE CORP.
as 1:2009cv01813
Plaintiff:
KRISTINE M. ELLISON
Defendant:
AM & EVE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZUKOWSKI et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01647
Plaintiff:
EVE M. ZUKOWSKI and JOHN L. LIPPMAN
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, KREMERS-URBAN CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jaffe, Rochelle v. Pallotta Teamworks, et al
as 03-7121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rochelle Jaffe, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eve Jaffe
Defendant - Appellee:
Pallotta Teamworks, A California Corporation, et al. and University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, On behalf of its R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
