Cases 1 - 10 of 17
HOLLAND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv02754
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLAND v. COSTCO WHOLESALE GROUP
as 1:2021cv02431
Plaintiff:
ROGER HOLLAND
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLAND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01611
Plaintiff:
LYNDA HOLLAND
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLLAND v. WATERGATE HOTEL et al
as 1:2018cv02628
Defendant:
WATERGATE HOTEL, LESSEE d/b/a THE WATERGATE HOTEL, ROCKWOOD CAPITAL, LLC, WATERGATE HOTEL and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLLAND v. TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00573
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS HOLLAND
Defendant:
TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HOLLAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ronald Emrit v. Holland & Knight, et al
as 17-7032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant - Appellee:
Holland & Knight, D.C. Bar, On the Potomac Productions and others
EMRIT v. HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP et al
as 1:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP, D.C. BAR, ON THE POTOMAC PRODUCTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH, III v. HOLLAND, LP et al
as 1:2016cv02242
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. SMITH, III
Defendant:
HOLLAND, LP and PLASSER AMERICAN CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
RARDON et al v. HOLLAND, LP et al
as 1:2016cv00539
Plaintiff:
LYLE G RARDON and CAROLYN A RARDON
Defendant:
HOLLAND, LP, JUSTIN L MCFERRIN, WILLIAM DAVIS, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
