Cases 1 - 4 of 4
CHAND et al v. MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
SALLY CHAND, MICHAEL CHAND, JR., CHRISTINA MAHON and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Deborah Peterson, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 17-7013
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Deceased), James Abbott, Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry Abbott (Deceased), Robert B. Allman, Personal Representative of the Estate of John Robert Allman (Deceased) and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Iranian Ministry of Information and Security
Interested Party - Appellant:
Jay Glenn
Deborah Peterson, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 17-7012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Deceased), James Abbott, Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry Abbott (Deceased), Robert B. Allman, Personal Representative of the Estate of John Robert Allman (Deceased) and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Iranian Ministry of Information and Security
Claimant - Appellant:
Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC and David J. Cook, Esq., Lienholder
Deborah Peterson, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 13-7086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deborah D. Peterson, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Deceased), James Abbott, Personal Representative of the Estate of Terry Abbott (Deceased), Robert B. Allman, Personal Representative of the Estate of John Robert Allman (Deceased) and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security and Alan L. Balaran, Special Master
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
