Torts - Injury Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 537
HOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01536
Plaintiff: SHERMAN G. HOLLEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Arthur Martin v. USA
as 24-5142
Plaintiff: Arthur Lee Martin
Defendant: United States of America
Teresita Canuto v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5068
Plaintiff: Teresita A. Canuto
Defendant: United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney's Office
BARREIRO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00980
Plaintiff: NIURKA BARREIRO and RUBEN MURO SUAREZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Christopher Buie v. USA
as 24-5057
Plaintiff: Christopher L. Buie
Defendant: United States of America
Aror-Ark O'Diah v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5074
Plaintiff: Aror-ark Ark O'diah
Defendant: John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, United States Small Business Administration, also known as United States Small Business Administration, SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator and others
MURRAY v. SHAW et al
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff: MICHELLE M MURRAY and MICHELLE M. MURRAY
Defendant: DEBBIE SHAW, JOSCELYN FUNNIE, LISA REIN and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
USA, et al v. Tata Consultancy Services, LTD
as 24-7032
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Anil Kini and Anil Kini
Defendant: Tata Consultancy Services, LTD
CAVIC v. MAVEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff: DANNY CAVIC
Defendant: MAVEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION, KAVITA DAWSON and ROBINSON MFG, INC.
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch of United States Government
as 24-5090
Plaintiff: Matthew Jones
Defendant: Judicial Branch of United States Government

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?